Wednesday, July 3, 2013
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
Many tax planning questions arise after Supreme Court's DOMA decision
On June 26, the U.S. Supreme Court held that Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional (E.S. Windsor, SCt., June 26, 2013). Immediately after the decision, President Obama directed all federal agencies, including the IRS, to revise their regulations to reflect the Court's order. How the IRS will revise its tax regulations - and when - remains to be seen; but in the meantime, the Court's decision opens a number of planning tax opportunities for same-sex couples.
Background
The Supreme Court agreed in 2012 to hear an appeal of a federal estate tax case. Due to DOMA, the surviving spouse of a same-sex married couple was ineligible for the federal unlimited marital deduction under Code Sec. 2056(a). The survivor sued for a refund of estate taxes. A federal district court and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals found unconstitutional Section 3 of DOMA, which defines marriage for federal purposes as only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife.
Supreme Court's decision
In a 5 to 4 decision, the Supreme Court held that Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment. Writing for the five-justice majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy said that "DOMA rejects the long-established precept that the incidents, benefits, and obligations of marriage are uniform for all married couples within each State, though they may vary, subject to constitutional guarantees, from one State to the next." Kennedy explained that "by creating two contradictory marriage regimes within the same State, DOMA forces same-sex couples to live as married for the purpose of state law but unmarried for the purpose of federal law, thus diminishing the stability and predictability of basic personal relations the State has found it proper to acknowledge and protect."
Chief Justice John Roberts, who would have upheld DOMA, cautioned that "the Supreme Court did not decide if states could continue to utilize the traditional definition of marriage." Roberts noted that the majority held that the decision and its holding "are confined to those lawful marriages-referring to same-sex marriages that a State has already recognized."
Tax planning
The Supreme Court's decision impacts countless provisions in the Tax Code, covering all life events, such as marriage, employment, retirement and death. The affect on the Tax Code cannot be overstated. It is expected that the IRS will move quickly to clarify how the decision impacts many of the more far-reaching provisions, such as filing status and employee benefits. Other provisions, especially the complex estate and gift tax provisions, will likely require more time from the IRS to issue guidance.
For federal tax purposes, only married individuals can file their returns as married filing jointly or married filing separately. Because of DOMA, the IRS limited these married filing statuses to opposite-sex married couples. The IRS is expected to issue guidance. Same-sex couples who filed separate returns may want to explore the benefits of filing amended returns (as married filing jointly), if applicable. Our office will keep you posted of developments.
Among the other provisions in the Tax Code affected by the Supreme Court's decision are:
- Adoption benefits
- Child tax credit
- Education tax credits and deductions
- Estate tax marital deduction
- Estate tax portability between spouses
- Gifts made by spouses
- Retirement plans
Looking ahead
Will the federal government look to where the same-sex couple was married (state of celebration) or where the same-sex couple reside (state of residence) for purposes of federal benefits? The Supreme Court did not rule on Section 2 of DOMA, which provides that no state is required to recognize a same-sex marriage performed in another state. At the time of the Supreme Court's decision, 12 states and the District of Columbia recognize same-sex marriage.
In some cases, the rules for marital status are determined by federal regulations, which can be changed without action by Congress. In other cases, the rules are set by statute, which would require Congressional action. Sometimes, a federal agency follows one rule for some purposes but another rule for other purposes. Generally, the IRS has used place of domicile for determining marital status. Our office will keep you posted of developments.
If you have any questions about the Supreme Court's decision and its impact on tax planning, please contact our office at (949) 453-1521 $$
Monday, June 24, 2013
Estate executors have tax filing responsibilities
Part of your responsibility as the executor or personal administrator of an estate involves making sure the necessary tax returns are filed — and there might be more of those than you expect. Here's an overview.
Personal income tax. You may need to file a federal income tax return for the decedent for the prior year as well as the year of death. Both are due by the following-year April 15 due date, even if the amount of time covered is less than a full year. You can request a six-month extension if you need additional time to gather information.
Gift tax. If the individual whose estate you're administering made gifts in excess of the annual exclusion ($14,000 for 2013), a gift tax return may be required. Form 709 is due April 15 of the year following the gift. The filing date can be extended six months. Estate income tax. Income earned after death, such as interest on estate assets, is reported on Form 1041, "Income Tax Return for Estates and Trusts." You'll generally need to file if the estate's gross income is $600 or more, or if any beneficiary is a nonresident alien. For estates with a December 31 year-end, Form 1041 is due April 15 of the following year.
Estate tax. An estate tax return, Form 706, is required when the fair market value of all estate assets exceeds $5,250,000 (for estates created in 2013). One thing to watch for: Spouses can transfer unused portions of the $5,250,000 exemption to each other. This is called the "portability" election. To benefit, you will need to file Form 706 when the total value of the estate is lower than the exemption.
Form 706 is due nine months after the date of death. You can request a six-month extension of time to file.
Give us a call at (949) 453-1521 for checklists and information about administering an estate. We're here to help make your task less stressful $$
Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Tax Impact of Health Care Law
- How will the increased medical deduction threshold affect me? Beginning in 2013, your unreimbursed medical expenses will have to exceed 10% of your adjusted gross income in order to claim an itemized deduction, unless you’re 65 or over. For your 2012 federal income tax return, the threshold is still 7.5%.Tip: Consider shifting elective medical expenses into 2012.
- Should I convert my Roth in 2012? Starting January 2013, a 3.8% tax on unearned income such as capital gains, dividends, and interest applies if your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is more than $200,000 ($250,000 for married filing jointly). Distributions from Roths do not increase your MAGI - but conversions do.To do: Calculate your tax exposure before year-end.
- Will the additional Medicare tax on earned income apply to me? The new 0.9% Medicare surtax takes effect in January 2013, and will apply when your compensation and self-employment income exceeds $200,000 ($250,000 when you’re married filing jointly). Your employer is only required to take your wages into consideration when withholding the tax.Result: Your estimated tax payments or withholding amounts might need to be adjusted next year.
Friday, March 23, 2012
2011 Schedule C changes

Here are two changes to the 2011 Schedule C.
New informational questions. Did you pay rent or hire an independent contractor to perform services for your business during 2011? For payments to certain vendors that total more than $600, you're required to complete Form 1099-MISC — and the IRS wants to make sure you do. Two new questions on the 2011 Schedule C ask about your information return filing responsibilities.
Thursday, February 23, 2012
Health Insurance Premium Credit

February, 2012
Remember the postcard you got from the IRS last year introducing the health insurance premium credit for small businesses? To paraphrase the old song, there's no letter in the mail for you this year.
Your business can still get the credit, though. When you qualify, you can use it to offset your federal income tax liability by up to 35% of the cost of health insurance premiums you pay for employees.
Three general tests for eligibility are:
Employing fewer than 25 "full time equivalent" employees.
Paying average annual wages of less than $50,000.
Paying at least 50% of health insurance premiums for those employees.
Each test has specific requirements. For example, you may qualify for the credit, in full or in part, when you have more than 25 employees. That's because "full time equivalent" is based on hours your employees worked during the year.
In addition, some employees aren't counted for purposes of the credit, such as seasonal staff who were on the payroll for less than 120 days. Other excluded workers are sole proprietors, owner/employees, and shareholders who own more than 2% of the stock of an S corporation.
According to a recent report, many businesses that qualify for the health insurance premium credit fail to take it. Give us a call at (949) 453-1521 or email us at taxalert@maxwellcompany.com. We'll make sure you get full benefit of all the tax breaks available to you$


